Artificial Life for Philosophers
نویسنده
چکیده
Artificial life (ALife) is the attempt to create artificial instances of life in a variety of media, but primarily within the digital computer. As such, the field brings together computationally-minded biologists and biologically-minded computer scientists. I argue that this new field is filled with interesting philosophical issues. However, there is a dearth of philosophers actively conducting research in this area. I discuss two books on the new field: Margaret A. Boden’s The Philosophy of Artificial Life and Christopher G. Langton’s Artificial Life: An Overview. They cover three areas of philosophical interest: the definition of life, the relationship between life and mind, and the possibility of creating life within a computational environment. This discussion allows me to critique past work in the philosophy of ALife that tends to see the field as a proving ground for traditional arguments from the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Instead, I suggest, what is interesting about ALife is how it differs from artificial intelligence and that the most interesting philosophical issues in the area are those derived from biology, not psychology. I recommend that these two books taken together constitute an interesting introduction to ALife and the wealth of philosophical issues found therein.
منابع مشابه
حسّ حضور، مطلوبترین برآیند ارتباطات انسان با محیط
From early times until nowadays with the issue seriously intensified, many philosophers, reformists and those who investigate the means for prosperity of human beings have introduced “the best” for man in different areas. The best place for living, city or architecture, has been one of the main issues. “The city of God”, “Utopia”, “House of Desired”, “Good city”, “Human architecture” and so on ...
متن کاملWhy I stopped worrying about the definition of life... and why you should as well
In several disciplines within science—evolutionary biology, molecular biology, astrobiology, synthetic biology, artificial life— and outside science—primarily, ethics—efforts to define life have recently multiplied. However, no consensus has emerged. In this article, I argue that this is no accident. I propose a dilemma showing that the project of defining life is either impossible or pointless...
متن کاملPii: S0950-7051(00)00048-4
Knowledge is an interesting concept that has attracted the attention of philosophers for thousands of years. In more recent times, researchers have investigated knowledge in a more applied way with the chief aim of bringing knowledge to life in machines. Artificial Intelligence has provided some degree of rigour to the study of knowledge and Expert Systems are able to use knowledge to solve pro...
متن کاملEssay : David Kelley 9 s EVIDENCE OF THE SENSES : A REALIST THEORY OF PERCEPTION RANDALL
T his is an important book. This is so in spite of the fact that the publisher, Louisiana State University Press, is not one of the major academic presses, and in spite of the fact that Kelley is not a name known everywhere in the Anglo-American philosophical world. The importance of the book has three sources. First, it is a defense of a striking proposal-what Melley calls the "realist theory ...
متن کاملThree Philosophical Perspectives on Logic and Psychology: Implications for Mathematics Education * *
Presuppositions regarding the proper relationship between logic and psychology are deeply embedded in any educational philosophy or theory regarding curriculum and instruction. Educational philosophers and curriculum theorists have long grappled with the relationship between the logical structure of subject matter knowledge and the psychological processes involved in understanding those structu...
متن کامل